..续本文上一页(Boston: Wisdom Publ.1984).167页.

　　73.------,< The Two Truths in the Madhyamika Philosophy of the Ge-luk-ba Order of Tibetan Buddhism>(Snow Lion 1992).309页.

　　74.R.K.Payne, “review on D.R.Komito”s no. 5 1989.p.112-113.

　　75.Rabten(Geshe), (Boston: Wisdom Publ.1986).147页.

　　76.D.S.Ruegg, “ the Jo nan pas : a school of Buddhist ontologists according to the Grub mtha sel gyi me lon” < Journal of American Oriental Society> 83.1963.p.63-91.

　　77.------,”on the reception and early history of the dbuma(madhyamika)in Tibet”, in M.Aris and Aung Suu Kyi(ed.), (New Dehli: Vikas 1980).p.227-279.

　　78.------,” on the thesis and assertion in the Madhyamika246”, in E.Steinkellner(ed.),,(Wien Universitrt Wien 1983).p.205-241.

　　79.------,” does the Madhyamika have a thesis and philosophical position

　　”, in B.K.Matilal(ed.),< Buddhist Logic and Empistemology>, (Reidel Publ.1986).p.229-237.

　　80.------,” on Pramana theory in Tson kha pa”s Madhyamika philosophy”, in E.Steinkellner(ed.),, Osterreichische Akadem der Wissenschaften , Philosophisch-Historische Klasse,Denkschriften 22(Beitrage zur Kulter und Geistesgeschichte Asiens 8),Wien 1991.s.281-310.

　　81.M.Sato(佐藤道郎),”Die Madhyamika Philosophie der Sa-skya Schule: Remmda ba gZon nu blo gros”, in < Contributions on Tibetan and Buddhist Religion and Philosophy>, volume 2.Wien 1983.

　　82.B.Siklos, “review of R.Thurman”s translation of Tson kha pa”s ”, 15 1987.p.109-110.

　　83.Sonam Rinchen(Geshe) and R.Sonam, < The Yogic Deeds of Bodhisttvas: Gyel-tsap on Aryadeva”s “Four Hundred”>(Snow Lion 1994).398页.

　　84.Sopa (Geshe),” Some comments on Tsong kha pa”s Lam rim chen mo and Professor

　　S A.Wayman”s ”,3.1980.p.68-92.

　　85------,(New York:Snow Lion 1976).

　　86------,“Geshe Sopa relies to Alex Wayman”,3.p.98-100

　　87.M.Sweet,“Bodhicaryavatara 9:2 as a focus for Tibetan Buddhist interpretataion of two truths in Pr asangika-Madhyamika”,2.1979.P.78-89

　　88.Tenzin Gyatso (D_LamaXIV),j.Hopkins译，(London:George Allen and Unwin.1975)

　　89.T.Tillemans,“the ”meither one nor man”:argument for sunyata and its Tibetan interpretations”,in E.Steinkellner and H.Tauscher(ed.),,编入,Wien 1983.

　　90.------,“two Tibetan texts on the ”neither one nor many” argument for sunyata”,12.1984.P.357-388.

　　91.------,“Indian and Tibetan Madhyamika on manasapratyaksa”14(1).p.70-85.

　　92.------,“the neither one mor many argument for aunyata and its Tibetan interpretations:background information and source materials”,Etude de Lettres ,Universite de Lausanne,Switzerland1982.3p.103-128.

　　93.R.Thurman(ed.),(Dharmasala:Libraray of Tibetan Works and Archives 1993).258页.

　　94.------,(Princeton University Press1991).443页

　　95.------，“philosophical non-egocentrism in Wittgenstein and Candrakirti in treatment of the private language problem”,30.1980.P.321-337.

　　96/F.Tola及C.Dragonetti,,(Dehli:Motlala Banarsidass Publ.1995).209页。

　　97.------，(Dehli:Motilal Banarsidass1996).170页。

　　98.L.W.J.van der Kuijp,“approps of a recent contribution to the history of Central Way Philosophy in Tibet : Tsong kha pa”s ,《缘起与空性(刘宇光译)》全文未完，请进入下页继续阅读…