..續本文上一頁 1980).
35.----------,“revicw a comparative table of sa bcad of the Pramanavarttika found in Tibetan commentaries on the 《Pramanavarttka》”,《JIP》17,1989.p.207-209.
36.Th.Stcherbatsky,《Buddhist Logic》,Academy of Sciences of USSR,Leningard 1930.二卷本1027頁(559+468).
37.E.Steinkellner,“the spiritual place of the epistemological tradition”,《Nanto Buddyo》(《Journal of the Nanto Society for Buddhist Studies》)49,1982.p.1-15.
38.----------,“tshad mai skyes bu:meaning and historical significance of the term”,in E.Steinkellner and H.Tauscher(ed.),《Contributions on Tibetan and Buddhist Religion and Philosophy》Vol.2,Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde,Heft 11,1983.p.274-284.
39.----------(ed.),《Studies in Buddhist Epistemology Tradition:Proceedings of the Second International Dharmakirti Conference》,Osterrichische Akademic der Wissenschaften Philosophische-Historische Klasse,Denkschriften 22(Beitrage zur Kultur und Geistesgeschichte Asien 8)Vienna,1991.i D.S.Ruegg,“on pramana-theory in Tson-kha-pa”s Madhyamiks Philosophy”.
40.Thachin Lobsang(Geshe),《The Logic and Debate Tradition of India,Tibet and Mongolia:History,Reader and Resources》Howell,NJ:Rashi Gempel Ling 1979.
41.T.Tillemans,“on a recent work on T, ibetan Buddhist epistemology”《Etude Asiatiques》38(1),1984.p.59-66.
42.--------,“formal and semantic aspects of Tibetan Buddhist debate logic”《JIP》17,1989.p.265-297.
43.--------,“Dharmakirti and Tibetan on adrsyanupalabhihetu”,《JIP》23,1995.p.129-149.
44--------,“person of authority:a Tibetan works on the central religious questions in Buddhist epistemology”,《Tibetan and Indo-Tibetan Studies》.University of Hamburg,Wiesbaden 1995.
45.T.Tillemans and D,Lopez,Jr.,“What can one reasonable say about nonexistence
a Tibetan work on the problem of asrayasiddha”《JIP》26,1998.p.99-129.
46.T.Tillemans,“on the so-called defficult point of the apoha theory”《Asiatische Studien/Etudes Asiatiques》49(4).p.853-889.1995.
47.T.Tillemans,“identity and referential opacity in Tibetan Buddhist apoha theory”,in B.K.Matilal(ed.),《Buddhist Logic and Epistemology:Studies in the Buddhist Analysis of Inference and Language》(Reidel Publ,1986).303頁.
48.V.A.van Bijlert,《Epistemology and Spiritual Authority with an Annoted Translati, on of Dharmakirti”s Pramanavarttia II.VV.1-7》,Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde,Arbeitskreis fur Tibetische und Buddhistisch Studien,Universitrt Wien 1989.
49.L.van der Kuijp,“Phya-Pa Chos kyi Seng-ge”s impact on Tibetan epistemological theory”,《JIP》5.1978.
50.---------,“introductory notes to the Pramanavarttka based on Tibetan sources”,《TJ》4(2),1979,p.2-28.
51.--------,“studies in the life and thought of mKhas-grub-rje:mKhasgrub-rje”s epistemological oeuvre and hist philological remarks on Dignaga”s Pramanasamuccaya I”,《Berliner Indologische Studien》Band I,Reinbeck:Verlag fur Orrientalistische Fachpublikationen.
52.-------,“two Mongol xylographys of the Tibetan texts of Sa skys Pandita”s works on Buddhist logic-epistemology”,《JIABS》16(2).p.279-298.
53.--------,《Contributions to the Development of Tibetan Buddhist Epistemology:From Eleventh to Thirteenth Century》(Weisbaden:Franz Steiner Verlag,Alt und Neu-indische Studien herausgegeben rom Seminar fur Kultur und Geschichte Indiens an der Universitrt Hamburg 26,1983)
54.------,“an early Tibetan view of the soteriology of Buddhist epistemology”,《JIP》15,1987.p.57-70.
55.S.C.Vidyabhusana,“Dignage and his Pramana-samuccaya ”,《Journal and proceedings of the Asiatic Society of Bengal》,new series vol.1.1905.p.217-227.
56.-------,“Indian logic as preserved in Tibet”,《Journal and proceedings of the Asiatic Society of Bengal》,new series vol.3.1907.p.95-102,241-255.541-551.
57.L.Zwilling,《Dharmakirti on Apoha:The Ontology,Epistemology and Semantic of Negation…
《緣起與空性(劉宇光譯)》全文未完，請進入下頁繼續閱讀…