打开我的阅读记录 ▼

永明延寿的心性论▪P5

  ..续本文上一页劫量,见障何休?诸佛法门,本非时摄。计时立劫,非是佛乘。

  悟心成祖,先圣相传。故达磨大师云:明佛心宗。了无差误,行解相应,名之曰祖。[30]

  是谓发起成佛之念,即与真如佛性之体相应,烦恼空寂,贪嗔痴无体,一切不过是真如之体的作用,随即成佛。一念与真如之心相应,一念成佛;一日与真如之心相应,一日成佛。从一实佛乘来说,成佛与时间没有必然的联系,岂可说经过无量时间才能成佛?这里贯彻著理、事(包括时间的一念、无量劫)的圆融无碍的思想。既然真如之理体现在处处事事,佛与众生相即不二,一多相即,无量劫在一念,岂不可以说初发心即是成佛?觉悟真心,便与祖师无别。

  《宗镜录》卷15论述所谓“神通作用”时,延寿认为按照真实佛乘的道理,既然众生身具佛的体性,岂可说众生没有“神通”。这是从另一角度论述众生具有佛性,与佛无别的问题。延寿说:

  夫言真实神变者,无非演一乘门,谈无生理。一言契道,当生死而证涅槃;目

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  [30] 《宗镜录》卷14、卷3,分别载《大正藏》册48,页491上、页428中。

  页473

  击明宗,即尘劳而成正觉,刹那而革凡为圣,须臾而变有归空。如此作用,岂非神变耶!

  灭道(按:四谛中的灭谛、道谛)本自无修,无造无作,化诸群品,如幻住世。性绝无明,即是佛故。一念相应一念佛,一日相应一日佛,何若死要三僧祇?但了三界业,能空业处,任运接生,即是佛也。[31]

  “一乘”是引导众生成佛的教法,《法华经》、《华严经》皆可称为一乘教法,宗派中的天台宗、华严宗也可自称一乘教法,当然禅宗也自称最上一乘法。引文认为按照一乘教理,众生可以通过“一言契道”、与真如实相“一念相应”,了悟三界之业空幻无实,自然自在地接化众生,即为顿悟心性之理,超凡入圣而成佛。所谓神变或神通,不过如此。

  然而仔细品味原文,这主要是从众生具有与佛一样的本性,从众生皆具有立即成佛的可能性讲的。在这一点上,延寿与以往禅宗历代祖师的见解没有大的差别。这种说法旨在鼓励弟子和信徒建立自修自悟的信心。此外,延寿还从现实性上强调成佛还需要修持六度万行、经历若干阶位。这是以往禅宗所没有提到的。延寿是借用华严宗的“行布门”来说修行阶位的。《宗镜录》卷23载有一段问答,现摘取部分:

  问:此一心宗成佛之道,还假历地位修证不?

  答:此无住真心(按:所谓真如之心,心之体),实不可修,不可证,不可得。何以故?非取果,故不可证;非著法,故不可得;非作法,故不可修。以本净非莹,法尔天成。若论地位,即在世谛,亦不失理。以无位中论其地位,不可起决定有无之执。《经》明十地(按:菩萨成佛经过十个阶位)差别,如空中鸟牵。若圆融门,寂灭真如,有何次第?若行布门,对治习气,升进非无。又染净阶位,皆依世俗名字分别,则似分阶降,不坏一心。……[32]

  从真谛来说,众生本具真如之心(理想的心体),即心是佛,体如空寂实相,是不可修证的,是没有阶位升降可言的。但从世俗的角度来说,相应对治烦恼的程度而设置升降阶位和修行要求是必要的。延寿又补充说,从根本上看,也应把这些高低的阶位,皆看作是一心之理的显现。当然,按照前面所述理事圆融的理论,既然事不碍理,并且事事圆融无碍,从事各种等级层次的修行,是有助于达到明心见性的。

  延寿在《万善同归集》卷1说:

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  [31] 《大正藏》册48,页497上、下。

  [32] 《大正藏》册48,页543下~544上。

  页474

  夫万善是菩萨入圣之资粮,众行乃诸佛助道之阶渐。若有目而无足,岂到清凉之地?得实(按:实指禅宗和华严宗)而忘权(按:禅、华严之外诸宗),奚升自在之域?是以方便、般若,常相辅翼;真空、妙有,恒共成持。《法华》会三归一(按:声闻、缘觉、菩萨三乘,皆归一佛乘),万善悉向菩提。[33]

  这一点是延寿禅法的特点之一。延寿在《万善同归集》和《注心赋》等当中,对此有详细论述。

  综上所述,延寿的心性论是在继承禅宗的“以心传心、见性成佛”和“即心是佛”、自修自悟思想的基础上,广泛吸收华严宗和其他宗派的心性思想而建立的,虽依据“理事圆融”、“真妄交彻”的理论提出“一念成佛”的说法,但同时又主张理事双修,认为渐次修持六度万行有助于达到明心见性。

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  [33] 《大正藏》册48,页958下。

  

  The Mind-Nature Theory of Yongming Yanshou

  Professor, Institute for Research on World Religions,

  Chinese Academy of Social Science

  Yang, Zengwen

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  页475

  Summary

  Yanshou (904~975) was born into a family of Wang in Qiantang. He inherited the dharma lineage of Tiantai Deshao (890~971), the disciple of Wenyi who was the founder of Fayan Sect. Yanshou first spread dharma at Xyedou Shan, Ming Zhou and gradually became well-known. In 960, Qian Hongchu, the king of Wuyue State, appointed Yanshou to take the first abbocy of the newly-built monastery at Lingyin Shan, Hang zhou. Next year, the king also appointed him as the second abbot of the great monastery at Yongming Qiantang. His disciples once exceeded 2,000. He has written many books including the 100-fascicled Zong Jing Lu, the 3-fascicled Wan Shan Tong Gui Ji, the one-fascicled Wei Xin Jue, the 4-fascicled Zhu Xin Fu, and the one-fascicled Guan Xin Xuan Shu.

  In these books, on one hand he described systematically the essence of Ch”an Sect, i.e. “to transmit mind with mind and not to attach to words,”“to point directly at man”s mind and to see the mind-nature to become Buddha”; on the other hand, he took reference from other Buddhist sects to discuss the mind-nature theory and practice techniques in details. He suggested to integrate the two in order to link ch”an and teachings as well as to practise principle and phenomenon at the same time.

  The theory of Yanshou”s ch”an techniques claims “to regard mind as the principal,” i.e. to consider mind as “the superior,” “the substance,” and “the wisdom.” In other words, he exalted the Buddha-nature

  页476

  theory of Mahaayaana Buddhism as the standard to observe and explain everything of the world, the human society, the de…

《永明延寿的心性论》全文未完,请进入下页继续阅读…

菩提下 - 非赢利性佛教文化公益网站

Copyright © 2020 PuTiXia.Net