..續本文上一頁Indologische>Band I,1985.p.47-74.
99.------,“review on Prof.Lopez Jr.”s,”Bulletin of the School Oriental and African Studies 52.1989.
100.Wangyal (Geshe), 101.A.Wayman , 102.------,“Alex Wayman replies to Geshe Sopa”, 103.------,“Tsong kha pa”s 104.------,“Introduction to Tson kha pa”s 105.P.Williams,“Tsong kha pa on kun-rdzob bden-pa”,in M.Aris,Kyi Aris(ed), 106,------,“silence and truth:some aspects pf the Madhyamaka philosophy in Tibet” 107.------,“on Rang Rig”, 108.------,“a notes on some aspects of Mi bskyod rdo rje”s critique of dGe-lugs-pa”s Madhyamika philsosphy”, 109.------,“review article on Chr.Lindtner”s 110.-------,“rMa bya pa buang chub brtson Grus on Madhyamika method”, 111.------,“review on 112.------,“some random reflection on the study of Tibetan Madhyamika, 113.------,“on interpretation ofMadhyamika thought”, 114.------,“nonconceptuality,criticial reasoning and religious experience:some Tibetan Buddhist Discussion”,M.McGhee(ed), 115.S.Onoda(小野田俊藏),“On the Tibetan controversy concerning the various ways of relying to Prasangas” 119.B.A.Wallace, 117.J.J.Makransky, 118.D.Cozort.Jr., 120.P.Williams, 122.S.K.Hookham, 123.K.Liberman ,“Can emptiness be formulated A debate from Ge-luk ba monastic university”, 124.C.Yoshimizu(吉水千鶴子),“Tson kha pa on don byed mus pa”in H,Krasser et ak\l (ed ), 125.T.Tillemans and D.Lopez,J.r.,“What can one reasonably say about nonexistence a Tibetan work on the problem of asrayasiddha hetu” 126.T.Tillemans,“Tsong kha pa et al. On the Bhavaviveka-Candrakirti Debate”in S.Ihara(並原)and Z.Yamaguchi(山口瑞鳳)(ed), 127.G,Dreyfus, 128.M.Tatz,(Queenston:The Edwin Mellen Press1986)358頁。 129.A.Wayman, 130.T.Jinpa, 131.-----,“Delineating reason”s scope for megation Tsongkhapa”s contribution to Madhyamaka”s dialectical method”, 132.W.Ames,“A transl… 《緣起與空性(劉宇光譯)》全文未完,請進入下頁繼續閱讀…