..续本文上一页l 1988).p.86-106.
50.A.Klein,《Path to the Middle》(SUNY 1994).p.xviii,62,67-69,76,159,223,235-239,267.
51.Y,Kaiyama(梶山雄一),“Later Madhyamika on epistemology and meditation”,in M.Kiyota(清田)ed.,《Mahayana Buddhist Meditation》(Honolulu:University Press of Hawaii 1982).p.114-143.
52.L.W.J.van der Kuijp,“Miscellanes to a recent contribution of to the bSamyas debate”,《Kailash》10,1985.
53.---------,“On the sources for Sa skya Pandita”s notes on the bSamyas debate”,《JIABS》9(2),1986.p.147-153.
54.K.Lang,“Meditation as a tool for deconstructing the phenomenal world”,in T.Skorupski and U.Pagel(ed),《The Buddhist Forum:Vol.Ⅲ 1991-1993》,School of Oriental and African Studies,University of London 1994.
55.Lobsang Dargyay,“What is non-existent and wha, t is remanent in Sunyata
”,《JIABS》18,1990.p.81-91.
56.L, ongchen Rabjampa,《Practice of Dzogchen》(Snow Lion 1994).
57.G.Nagao(长尾雅人),“What remains in sunyata:a Yogacara interpretation of emptiness”,in 《Mahayana Buddhist Meditation》。这。66-81。
58．E.Napper,《Dependent-Arising and Emptiness》(Boston:Wisdom Publ.1989).p.22,52,102,125,155,237,667.
59.K.R.Norman,“Mistaken ideas about Nibbana”,《in The Buddhist Forum Ⅲ 1991-1992》.
60.D.S.Ruegg,“The council of Tibet in two early Tibetan works”,proceedings of the XXXII International Congress for Asian and North African Studies,Hamburg 1986(=Zeitschrift der
Deutschen Morgenlandischen Gesellschaft Supplement,IX,1992).p218.
61.--------,“On the Tibetan historiography and doxography of the great debate of bSamyas”,Tibetan Studies, Proceedings of the 5th Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies. Narita 1989(Ihar Shoren et al.,Monograph Series of Naritasan Institute for Buddhi Studies, Occasional Papers, Narita, Naritasan Shinshoji 1992).p.237
62.---------,《Buddha-Nature, Mind and the Problem of Gradualism in a Comparative Perspective》(New Dehli: Heritage Publ.1992)
63.Y.Siezan(柳田圣山),“The 《Li-Tai Da-Pan Chi》and the Chan doctrine of sudden awakening”,《in Early Chan in China and Tibet》.p.13-49.
64.R.A.Stein(石泰安)，“Sudden illumination or simultaneous comprehension: remarks on Chinese and Tibetan terminologies”,《Sudden and Gradual Approaches to Enlightenment in Chinese Thought》.p.41-65.
65.D.Snellgrove,《Indo-Tibetan Buddhism》(Boston: Shamhala Publ.1987)p.430-435.
66.Takpo Tashi Namgyal, translated by Lobsang Lhalungpa,《Mahamudra: The Quintes of Mind and Meditation》(Boston: Shambhala Publ.1986)p.xxxi-xli,p.105-108.
67.G,Tucci,《Minor Buddhist Texts》(Dehli: Motilal Banarsidass 1958).p.315-464.
68.D.Ueyama(上山大峻),“The study of Tibetan Chan manuscripts recovered from Tun-hung: a review of the field and its prospects”,《in Early Chan in China and Tibet》.p.327-349.
69.H.B.Urban&P.Griffiths,“What else remains in Sunyata
”,《JIABS》17(1).p.1-25.
70.A.Wayman,“Doctrinal disputes and the debate of bSamyas”,《Central Asiatic Journal XXI》,no.5 1977.p.139-144.
71.-----------,《Calming the Mind and Discerning the Real》(Dehli: Motilal Banarsidas) p.5,44,53-57,86,159,175,252,319,392,404,407,471.
72.-----------,《Ethics of Tibet: Bodhisattva Section of Tsong-Kha-pa》(Dehli: Sri Satguru Publ.1992).p.14,89,90.
73.P.William,“Nonconceptuality, critical reasoning and religious experience”,M.McGhee(ed.),《Philosophy ,Religion and Spiritual Life》(London: Cambridge University Press 1992).p.189.
74.Z.Yamaguchi(山口瑞凤)，“the core elements of Indian Buddhism introduced into Tibet: a contrast with Japanese Budhism”,in J.Hubbard and P.Swanson(ed.),《Pruning the Bodhi Tree:The Storm Over Critical Buddhism》(University of Hawaii Press,Honolulu,1997)p.220-241.
75.Kenneth.K.Tanaka(田中) and R.Roberstson,“a Chan text from Tun-hung:implications for Chan influence on Tibetan Buddhism”,in S.Goodman and R.Davidson(ed.),《Tibetan Buddhism: Reason and Revelantion》(SUNY 1992).p.57-78.
II…
《缘起与空性(刘宇光译)》全文未完，请进入下页继续阅读…